For weeks I’ve been wrestling with the loss of obscenity in the USA lexicon. I won’t say that radical profanity has disappeared from America because I’m not living in Canada, Central America and South America and I don’t know how things are there(s). USA, I’m writing to you.
It appears to me that “F” is the new “damned.” I don’t write (obseen) or speak (obsheard) the word, because I consider it a word of last resort. I’m not a Puritan . Put me next to an attractive, consenting, affectionate female on clean sheets, and I’m game for anything. I don’t believe there is intrinsic “evil” in any word. I have not met the word which will harm me or harm a friend or unfriend when heard or seen. Still, I would rather say “feces” or semi-“solid waste effluent” than S. Without wandering too far from the point of this ramble — which is F — I would like to know if S is the worst thing you can say about something. “Conger, this little snit you’re writing is nothing but S!” Is that the best you can do, stranger? If you called it bullS instead, would you expect me to feel more regret or shame because bullS is more disgusting to the senses? Does bullS have an added ingredient that imputes more woe to the subject when used in metaphorical descriptions?
“Tommy said my poem was S. If he thought it was really bad, I guess he would have called it bullS, so I will feel a modicum of solace from that Tommy’s holding back and count my blessings. It could have been worse, you know.”
What is YOUR worst obscenity? Can you print it? When do you say it?
Using F as an adjective or adverb — “Mind your own F’ing business”. . . “I F’ing love science.” — has crippled the formerly overwhelming power of the word. Despite the watering down, some expressions still have shock value: “F you” for example. The hateful expression is one reason I don’t like to see the word used by third graders and “growed ups” who think like them. Dick Cavett used to suggest to verbal sparring opponents, “Why don’t you take a walk into the lake until your hat floats?” The classic “Go to hell!” also makes the point. Today as society falls prey to the waning presence of religion as a shared thread of our social fabric hell no longer carries the weight it did when religion was a comfort and not a threat. That’s sad, a loss for all of us.
The connotation of HATE in F conflicts with what is implied when talking about what a songwriter called “making whoopie.” We don’t like to call it “making love,” when we’re just having fun with someone we don’t want to love. Love implies significant commitment. And even when people who are in love are “making love,” let’s be honest: they’re not “making” anything except, a reason to change the sheets in the morning. They might be “making” a zygote. They are sharing mutual appreciation, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Love is beautiful. So where does the hate come into that activity? All I see in the word “Fing”, on a bed, on the beach, in a tree, wherever. . . is disdain. “It was nothing serious, Conger, we were just Fing.” Call me Mary Poppins, but for some of us, that activity is serious. Always passionate, often joyful, affirming, satisfying, and serious. I still don’t understand the hate element.
Perhaps, I’ve got it reversed. Perhaps I don’t understand the love element. Jim tells Larry to go mind his Fing business because Larry’s Collie pooped on a mutual neighbor’s front yard as Jim watched. , Jim may be expressing the hope that Larry find a partner and relieve the tension that drove him to be such a raving lunatic following Jim’s initially gentle cajoling and suggestion that Larry become acquainted with a pooper scooper and baggies. But I think not. I believe that Jim was not being loving at all. I believe that Jim’s verbal recommendation had nothing to do with a constructive hope that Larry would consider a better way relieve his tension than by screaming at his neighbor after a gentle admonition. I believe that after Larry “lost it,” Jim lost it too. Loving had nothing to do with it.
The anger present in the urging of an offender to go F himself/herself makes this word unfit for intimacy. I know there is such a thing as connecting on clean sheets with hostile thoughts, despite two adults consenting without threat. There is “revenge sex” often engaged from a perspective of jealousy or disappointment over an unwanted decision or act by a formerly loving partner. People connect consentingly for more reasons than I’ve experienced, more reasons than I can count, probably. The only place where I acknowledge “F” in the vocabulary as valid is that when mutual consent is not part of the dynamic, and then it is a crime. We call it rape.
The word does not belong in everyday, all ages society. I do not believe we should “”censor” it out. I believe we should never place the word into everyday parlance to begin with. There are Facebook sites with “Fing” in their titles, that deliver interesting content, I am told, but I will never “Like” them.
You tell me to go mind my own Fing business. The state of my world IS my business. I turn my eyes from pictures and videos of people dying. The loss of the space shuttle Challenger exploding as it ascended skyward from its launching pad, a person lying dead in the street from a motorcycle accident, yes, even a dead animal run over 20 minutes ago in the traffic lane on my way to work. I steer around these things. I steer around F because it is my business.
I don’t fear the word. I don’t believe those who share it like candy are bad people. I think they share it like grape jam because to some, it smells like grape jam. To others it smells like S.
And I won’t touch it.
Live long . . . . . . . . . and proper.